Loading...

Interlinear Textus Receptus Bibles shown verse by verse.

Textus Receptus Bible chapters shown in parallel with your selection of Bibles.

Compares the 1550 Stephanus Textus Receptus with the King James Bible.

Visit the library for more information on the Textus Receptus.

Textus Receptus Bibles

King James Bible (Oxford) 1769

   

35:1Elihu spake moreover, and said,
35:2Thinkest thou this to be right, that thou saidst, My righteousness is more than God's?
35:3For thou saidst, What advantage will it be unto thee? and, What profit shall I have, if I be cleansed from my sin?
35:4I will answer thee, and thy companions with thee.
35:5Look unto the heavens, and see; and behold the clouds which are higher than thou.
35:6If thou sinnest, what doest thou against him? or if thy transgressions be multiplied, what doest thou unto him?
35:7If thou be righteous, what givest thou him? or what receiveth he of thine hand?
35:8Thy wickedness may hurt a man as thou art; and thy righteousness may profit the son of man.
35:9By reason of the multitude of oppressions they make the oppressed to cry: they cry out by reason of the arm of the mighty.
35:10But none saith, Where is God my maker, who giveth songs in the night;
35:11Who teacheth us more than the beasts of the earth, and maketh us wiser than the fowls of heaven?
35:12There they cry, but none giveth answer, because of the pride of evil men.
35:13Surely God will not hear vanity, neither will the Almighty regard it.
35:14Although thou sayest thou shalt not see him, yet judgment is before him; therefore trust thou in him.
35:15But now, because it is not so, he hath visited in his anger; yet he knoweth it not in great extremity:
35:16Therefore doth Job open his mouth in vain; he multiplieth words without knowledge.
King James Bible (Oxford) 1769

King James Bible (Oxford) 1769

By the mid-18th century the wide variation in the various modernized printed texts of the Authorized Version, combined with the notorious accumulation of misprints, had reached the proportion of a scandal, and the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge both sought to produce an updated standard text. First of the two was the Cambridge edition of 1760, the culmination of twenty-years work by Francis Sawyer Parris, who died in May of that year. This 1760 edition was reprinted without change in 1762 and in John Baskerville's fine folio edition of 1763. This was effectively superseded by the 1769 Oxford edition, edited by Benjamin Blayney.